Colorado public pensions
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| National Taxpayers Union |
| Action center |
Colorado public pensions administered by Colorado PERA. The pension system includes members who are state employees, public school teachers in the state, many university and college employees, judges, many employees of cities and towns, state troopers, and the employees of a number of other public entities.[1] Employees choose between a defined benefit plan or defined contribution plan.[2] The association has more than 201,000 active workers as members and approximately 94,000 benefit recipients. It is the 21st-biggest U.S. public pension plan.[3]
Colorado has 96,875 total public employees as of 2010.[4] In Fiscal Year 2010, the state has a total of 368,961 active and inactive pension fund members, with 88,819 receiving periodic benefit payments. [5]
According to the United States Census Bureau, the state has 65 locally-administered pension plans.[6]
The average Colorado public employee stops working at age of 58 and deposits a check for $2,883 each month.[7]
PERA is comprised of five separate pension funds, including one for Denver Public Schools. A look at PERA as a whole follows:
Colorado Public Employee Retirement Association
The PERA was established in 1931 as a defined benefit plan for more than 440,000 public employees. PERA membership includes state employees, school employees, judges and municipal employees. The fund has an automatic 2 percent cost of living adjustment. Prior to a 2010 legislative action to protect the fund's solvency, the cola was 3.5 percent. The fund operates under an assumed 8 percent rate of return, down from 8.5 percent in 2008.
Decline in funding
Colorado's system was under 70% funded in 2008, down from 105% funded in 2000.[8] The decrease in funding can be attributed to:
1. Increased benefits In the late 1990s, Colorado instituted automatic cost-of-living increases for retirees and a drop in the age of normal retirement from 55 to 50 with 30 years of service.
2. Missed contributions From 2002 on, the state paid only between 50%and 70% of its actuarially required contribution, for a total of $2.4 billion in payments that were skipped. These missed payments are added to future payments with the result that the contribution requirement goes up. The plans paid $2.8 billion in benefits to retirees in 2008, whereas contributions from employers and employees totaled only $1.6 billion.
3. Investment losses In 2008, Colorado’s investment losses were 26%, but when accounting for the expected 8.5% return, in effect, that the state lost not only $11 billion, but also the $3.46 billion it was expecting to earn that year to stay even.
A recent study by economists Joshua Rauh of the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University and Robert Novy-Marx of the University of Chicago Booth School of Business concluded that the Colorado pension fund will run out of money in 2021.[9] Should the pension fund run out of money then, the cost the following year would be $7.8 billion, which would be 54% of state revenue.[10]
A 2012 report by Morningstar, Inc. said the Colorado Public Employees' Retirement Association is not not "fiscally sound." PERA has $26 billion in unfunded liabilities. The Morningstar study said Colorado's PERA funded ratio for its state division was 57.7 percent, the number it based its "not fiscally sound" determination on. However, some of PERA's individual divisions were better off. The Denver Public Schools fund, for example, was funded at 81.5 percent, while the local and judicial divisions were each at 69.3 percent. [11]
Pension Plans
| Plan | Current Value | Percentage funded | Unfunded liabilities | Total state employees | Avg. pension |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colorado Public Employee Retirement Association | $35 billion | 68.9 percent | $24 billion | 190,206 members | $34,620 |
| Colorado County Officials & Employees’ Retirement Association | $59 billion | 66.1 percent | $20 billion | 93,655 members | $35,306 |
Contribution rates
Chapter 65, Laws of 2010 (SB 146), increases the employee contribution rates to the Public Employee Retirement Association for state employees, troopers and judges for FY2011 by 2.5% and equally decreases the employer contribution. For example, the state employee contribution rate changes from 8% to 10.5% of salary, while the employer rate goes from 10.15% to 7.65%. Contribution rates for local government members and teachers are not affected.[12]
For 2010, the state contribution per month is 13.85% of gross salary following any Section 125 salary reduction.[2]
Retirement age
The Colorado state legislature increased the 'retirement rule' for state employees to 88 from 85 as of 2011, and to 90 as of 2017.[13] The teachers' union, however, prevented an increase in the retirement age.[13]
Cost of living adjustment
In 2010, Colorado legislators passed a law that reduced the raise that people who are already retired get in their pension checks each year, capping the cost-of-living adjustment at 2% instead of the 3.5% raise that many retirees were getting, concluding that was the fastest way to revive its pension fund, which was projected to run out of money by 2029.[14] The retirees have sued to block the reduction.[7]
Colorado is the first state to impose pension cuts on its current employees, not just future employees. Most states do not do so because officials presume that they are legally bound to shield current workers from pension cuts.[14] A Colorado Supreme Court ruling from 1961 held that pension cuts for current workers were allowed if “actuarially necessary,” and the state plans to contend that the ruling also applies to retirees as well.[14]
Funding levels
The state's pension liabilities according to the Pew Center on the States[15], the American Enterprise Institute[16] and Professors Robert Novy-Marx of the University of Chicago and Joshua Rauh of Northwestern University, Kellogg Graduate School of Management.[17]
| PEW | AEI | Kellogg (2009) |
| $16,813,048 | $71,387,842 | $57,400,000 |
Other information from the Pew Center on the States Feb. 2010 publication "The Trillion Dollar Gap":
| Latest liability | Latest unfunded liability | Annual required contribution | Latest actual contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| $55,625,011 | 16,813,048 | 1,141,081 | 779,644 |
| Latest liability | Latest unfunded liability | Annual required contribution | Latest actual contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1,385,954 | $1,127,179 | $81,523 | $25,877 |
| Number of pension plans | Pension assets ($bn) | Stated liabilities ($bn) | Funding status (% of tax revenue) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $29.3 | $55.6 | -827% |
This data is based on projected data from 2008 census data.[18] In 2008, $1.94 trillion was set aside for pensions, but it is estimated that states have $5.17 trillion in unfunded liabilities.
Rate of return
Colorado presumes an 8.0% return rate on its pension investments.[8]
Local public pensions
- Main article: Local government public pensions
According to the United States Census Bureau, the state has 65 locally-administered pension plans.[6]
Litigation
In Justus et.al., v. the state of Colorado and PERA filed March 3, 2012, the issue facing the court is whether SB1 is unconstitutional because it impairs retirees’ contractual right to receive pension benefits as the level promised when employees retired or became eligible to retire. SB1 legislates that COLA drops to the lower of 2% or based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners (CPI-W). COLA could drop to zero if PERA experiences a negative investment return year.[19]
The case was DISMISSED by Denver District Court on June 29, 2011 as to the contractual PERA benefits, but PENDING on the non-contractual right to specific COLA benefits. On May 16, 2012, Colorado defendants and PERA defendants filed answer briefs with the Court of Appeals urging further authority and analysis of specific arguments raised by Plaintiffs, including the balancing test used in CO contracts clause cases.[20]
Transparency
The state Treasurer sued the Public Employees Retirement Association and 14 trustees for data about not beneficiaries retirement plans.[21]
Transparency
- Main articles: Public pension disclosure and Governmental Accounting Standards Board
Data availability
The names of recipients and amounts dispersed to recipients are generally not available, unless as required by law, but there is a presumption of privacy absent challenge.[22]
Fund performance data
Pension fund investment performance data is available on the COPERA site.[23]
Rate of return
The rate of return is posted on the COPERA site. Through 2011, PERA’s 10 year annualized rate of return was 5.7%. PERA’s annualized investment return was 8.5% over the last 25 years, and over the last 30 years it was 10%, exceeding the 8% investment rate of return assumption established by the Board of Trustees.[24]
Unfunded liabilities
The fund discloses the amount of unfunded liabilities. A PEW study reports $16,813,048,000 in unfunded pension liability in Colorado.[25]
Oversight
No information exists regarding external oversight. Audits of pension fund in addition to annual financial report are available and archived.[26] Pension lobbying information is available. Colorado PERA is spending up to $2.2 million annually on attorneys’ fees, $364,000 on lobbying and $2.8 million in salaries for its dozen top-paid executives.[27] Pay to play (the practice of investment managers contributing to officials with influence over public pension fund decisions) information is unavailable.
See also
External links
- Colorado PERA
- Colorado.gov - Benefits
- Colorado State Pension Fund Management - State Integrity Investigation
References
- ↑ About PERA
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 State of Colorado 2009 – 2010 Total Compensation Summary
- ↑ Bloomberg "Colorado Sues State Pension Plan Demanding Recipients’ Data" Sept. 19, 2011
- ↑ 2010 Annual Survey of Public Employment and Payroll, Census 2010
- ↑ 2010 Annual Survey of Public Employment and Payroll--Membership by State, Census 2010
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 "Public Employee Retirement Systems State- and Locally-Administered Pensions Summary Report: 2010", United States Census Bureau, April 30, 2012
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 The New York Times "Battle Looms Over Huge Costs of Public Pensions" August 6, 2010
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Pew Center on the States "The Trillion Dollar Gap" Feb. 2010
- ↑ New Mexico, Study: NM state pension plan will run out of money in 13 years, Sept. 9, 2010
- ↑ Yahoo! Finance “11 state Pension Funds That May Run Out of Money Oct. 18, 2010
- ↑ Denver Post, Report: Colorado's public worker pension fund not "fiscally sound", Nov. 30, 2012
- ↑ National Conference of State Legislators "Pensions and Retirement Plan Enactments in 2010 State Legislatures" July 19, 2010
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 The Wall Street Journal “Stressed States Are Forcing Workers to Retire Later“ August 2, 2010
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 The New York Times "In Budget Crisis, States Take Aim at Pension Costs" June 19, 2010
- ↑ "State Pensions and Retiree Healthcare Benefits: The Trillion Dollar Gap,” Pew Center on the States, accessed January 4, 2011
- ↑ Biggs, Andrew, “The Market Value of Public-Sector Pension Deficits,” AEI Outlook Series, no. 1 (2010)
- ↑ Novy-Marx, Robert and Joshua Rauh, 2010, "Public Pension Promises: How Big Are They and What Are They Worth," Journal of Finance (forthcoming)
- ↑ Northwestern University, The Liabilities and Risks of State-Sponsored Pension Plans, May 2010
- ↑ Justus et.at., v. state of Colorado and PERA
- ↑ CO and PERA Answer Briefs
- ↑ Bloomberg News, Colorado Sues State Pension Plan Demanding Recipients’ Data, Sept. 19, 2011
- ↑ Data availability
- ↑ - Performance Fund performance data
- ↑ Rate of return
- ↑ Unfunded pension liability
- ↑ Audits
- ↑ Pension lobbying
Public pensions | |
|---|---|
| Pension context |
Public pension eligibility • Public pension disclosure • State government pension liabilities |
| State public pension systems |
Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Delaware • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming |








