Crosland v. Butts County Board of Zoning Appeals

From Sunshine Review

Jump to: navigation, search

This WikiFOIA article is a stub. You can help us collect information about this case, and other important FOIA cases across the country, by either expanding this article or going to the Sunshine litigation project page and helping us expand other articles.

Croslandvs.Butts County Board of Zoning Appeals
Number: No. A94A0739
Year: 1994
State: Georgia
Court: {{{Court}}}
Other lawsuits in Georgia
Other lawsuits in 1994
Precedents include:

Contents

State Sunshine Laws
State Sunshine laws
State Open Meeting Laws
Transparency headlines
Statutory changes
Notable FOIA requests
How to ask for records
State sunshine lawsuits
State court cases
E-mail access
Private agency, public dollars
The WikiFOIA portal


Crosland v. Butts County Board of Zoning Appeals was a case before the Georgia Supreme Court in 1994 concerning open meetings laws.

[edit] Important precedents

[edit] Background

Crosland v. Butts County Board of Zoning Appeals, No. A94A0739 (Ga. App., July 15, 1994) (en banc) (Pope, J.), cert. applied for: Suit challenging Butts County Board of Zoning Appeals' grant of a solid waste landfill permit. The trial court (Smith, J.) granted summary judgment to the board, concluding that the board had not violated the Act. In an en banc decision, the Court of Appeals reversed and remanded, holding that fact issues existed as to whether the Act had been violated. The court noted that there was conflicting testimony as to whether the merits of granting the permit had been discussed at two nonpublic meetings that had been held by the board. Four judges dissented, arguing that even though the permit was discussed at closed meetings, the only "official action" occurred at an open meeting after public hearings.[1]

[edit] Supporters of the FOIA request

[edit] Criticisms of the FOIA request

[edit] Ruling of the court

[edit] Associated cases

[edit] See also

[edit] External links

[edit] References

  1. Synopsis of Georgia Open Meetings Act Cases