Minnesota Data Practices Act
From Sunshine Review
Contents |
The Minnesota Data Practices Act is a series of laws designed to guarantee that the public has access to public records of government bodies at all levels in Minnesota.
The Minnesota Open Meeting Law legislates the methods by which public meetings are conducted.
To learn more about how to make a public records request in this state, please see: Minnesota FOIA procedures
[edit] Recent news
[edit] Transparency blocking
More transparency blocking news from across the country.
[edit] Litigation
More FOIA litigation news from across the country.
[edit] Legislation
- The public’s right to know
- Bill would restrict public access to some 'U' info
- St. Louis County commissioner annoyed by cameras at meetings
More FOIA legislation news from across the country.
[edit] Sunshine Guardians
Other Sunshine Guardians from across the country.
[edit] Relevant legal cases
- See also: Court cases with an impact on state FOIA
Here is a list of lawsuits in Minnesota. For more information go the page or go to Minnesota sunshine lawsuits.
(The cases are listed alphabetically. To order them by year please click the icon to the right of the Year heading)
We do not currently have any pages on litigation in Minnesota. To add some see our Sunshine litigation project page.
[edit] Minnesota's transparency report card
A 2008 study, BGA - Alper Integrity Index, conducted by the Better Government Association and sponsored by Alper Services, ranked Minnesota #15 in the nation with an overall percentage of 57.30%. [1]
A 2007 study, Graded state responsiveness to FOI requests, conducted by BGA and the NFOIC, gave Minnesota 53 points out of a possible 100, a letter grade of "F", and a ranking of 21 out of the 50 states.[2]
A 2002 study, Freedom of Information in the USA, conducted by IRE and BGA, ranked Minnesota's law as the 40th worst in the country, giving it a letter grade of "D".[3]
[edit] Features of the law
The Minnesota Data Practices Act "establishes a presumption that government data are public and are accessible by the public for both inspection and copying unless there is federal law, a state statute, or a temporary classification of data that provides that certain data are not public."[4]
Minnesota law requires the dissemination of information with regard to procedures for DPA requests within each department. [5].
[edit] What records are covered?
Minnesota defines public records as "all data collected, created, received, maintained or disseminated by any government entity regardless of its physical form, storage media or conditions of use" [5].
Exceptions include but are not limited to:
- Information classified as both private and confidential[5]
- Personal information of students [5]
- Examination data [5]
- Social security numbers [5]
- Security information [5]
- Sealed ballots [5]
- Sealed bids [5]
- Parking space leasing [5]
- Labor relations [5]
- Health data except to the individuals practicing physician for the purpose of medical analysis [5]
- Civil litigation information and anything pertaining to attorney client priveledges. [5]
- Library records of borrowers [5]
- Licensing data, other than names and addresses [5]
- All personal data of employees except, name, job title, dates of employment, complaints, disciplinary actions, resolution of disputes, work location and telephone number, payroll time sheets and all information concerning undercover agents [5]
- Appraisal data for potential government sales or purchases [5]
- Welfare data on individuals, unless it is statistical data and does not release information on particular individuals [5]
- Information about individuals or corporations applying for government aid is exempt, except ther names and addresses [5]
- Foster care information [5]
- Employment and training data of individuals enrolled in state funded employment programs [5]
- Financial information submitted by companies for awards [5]
- Retirement data, excluding name, gross pension, and type of benefit awarded [5]
- Farm data which includes "nonfarm income; credit history; insurance coverage; machinery and equipment list; financial information; and credit information requests" [5]
- Consumer complaint data at the Attorney General's office[5]
- Employee Relations Data [5]
- Financial information and statistics provided by energy companies [5]
- Transportation department data, including motor carrier accidents and operations, construction estimates and complaints among other things [5]
- Museum and university donor and gift data [5]
- Domestic abuse data [5]
[edit] What agencies are covered?
The record indicates early on that all government agencies are subject to the law [5] However, the judiciary is exempt and is instead subject to the rules of the supreme court.
[edit] Who may request records?
Anyone may request public records in Minnesota. They are also entitled to have the data explained to them if they don't understand it. A "person shall be permitted to inspect and copy public government data". [6]
[edit] Must a purpose be stated?
Nothing in the law requires a statement of purpose.
[edit] How can records be used?
The only restriction of the use of records is that if a commercial use is intended the government agency may charge an additional fee.
[edit] Time allowed for response
- See also: Request response times by state.
There is no response time specified in the Minnesota law.
[edit] Fees for records
While the law indicates that there shall be no fees for inspection of records, it allows for the charging of fees when someone requests a copy of the records. These fees can include the cost of duplication as well as the labor costs involved in the search. However, they cannot charge for the separation of public and private data. However, if the records are intended for commercial purposes an additional fee may be charged. [5]
[edit] Open meetings
"All meetings, including executive sessions, must be open to the public"[7]
[edit] Proposed changes
- Main article: Proposed reforms in state sunshine laws, 2009
Senate Bill 94 [8] (and companion House Bill 100 [9]) would make "certain records pertaining to the I-35W bridge collapse compensation program" exempt from public disclosure. Sen. Limmer (R-Maple Grove) questioned the proposed bill, saying that "the public has a right to know ... how the compensation board makes its decisions. That record should be as open to the public as possible." [10]
[edit] Notable requests
[edit] See also
- Minnesota FOIA procedures
- Minnesota transparency headlines
- Minnesota transparency advocates
- Minnesota transparency legislation
- Minnesota Open Meeting Law
[edit] External links
- Minnesota Statutes Minnesota Government Data Practices Act
- Advisory opinions regarding the Data Practices Act
- Minnesota Statutes Open Meeting Law
- Open Government Guide to Minnesota
- Past articles on Minnesota
[edit] References
- ↑ Integrity Index available for download here
- ↑ Graded state responsiveness to FOI requests, 2007
- ↑ Freedom of Information in the USA, 2002
- ↑ Minnesota Statutes, 13.01
- ↑ 5.00 5.01 5.02 5.03 5.04 5.05 5.06 5.07 5.08 5.09 5.10 5.11 5.12 5.13 5.14 5.15 5.16 5.17 5.18 5.19 5.20 5.21 5.22 5.23 5.24 5.25 5.26 5.27 5.28 5.29 5.30 5.31 Minnesota Statute 13.03.3
- ↑ Minnesota Statutes, 13.03(a)
- ↑ Minnesota Statutes, 13D.01
- ↑ Text of SF94
- ↑ Text of HF100
- ↑ Friday opinuendo: On scrutiny, apostrophes, Blagoheads and more, Twin Cities.com, February 6, 2009
| |||||||||||
