• YouTube
  • Find us on the web:


Orange County employee salaries

Orange County employee salary information is partially available online for Orange County, California employees.

According to the Facts and Figures provided by Orange County website, the government employs approximately 11.2% of the Orange County population (3,166,461).[1] [2]

Contents

[edit] Salaries and benefits

Thirty-four employees of Orange County, CA make over $150,000 annually when additional pay, insurance premiums, and pension costs are included in total compensation. Based on salary alone, twenty-four employees make over $150,000 annually.[3]

Title Salary Other pay Pension Costs Total Compensation
Member, Board of Supervisors 1st Dist. $143,031 $25,122 $38,189 $218,219
Member, Board of Supervisors 2nd Dist. $143,031 $25,122 $40,667 $224,689
Member, Board of Supervisors 3rd Dist. $143,031 $25,122 $42,827 $223,173
Member, Board of Supervisors 4th Dist. $141,930 $28,502 ---- $184,717
Member, Board of Supervisors 5th Dist. $143,031 $18,087 ---- $168,714
Assessor $173,097 $27,527 $48,468 $259,281
Auditor-Controller $173,097 $27,527 $48,303 $ 264,797
Clerk-Recorder $139,526 $24,842 $41,247 $217,976
District Attorney $207,979 $21,138 ---- $245,225
Public Administrator $139,526 $24,842 $18,831 $192,863
Sheriff-Coroner $207,979 $21,138 $123,313 $359,518
Treasurer $79,225 $14,238 $23,066 $119,335

The Sheriff/Coroner has significantly higher pension costs ($123,313) than the average employee. [4]

[edit] Top 5 Highest Paid Workers

Listed in order of highest total compensation.

Title Salary Total Compensation
County Executive Officer* $253,562 $370,566
Sheriff/Coroner $207,979 $359,518
Chief Financial Officer $205,722 $299,343
Deputy CEO- Infrastructure $202,800 $292,395
Public Defender $202,779 $291,610

*Highest paid position. Also note that the County Executive Officer as well as fifteen other employees approved a salary reduction between $332.88-6,339.06. The CEO took the highest reduction.[5]

[edit] Phone use

Cell phone guidelines for purchasing equipment and services, usage, review and reimbursement are published.[6]

[edit] Car use/purchasing

County of Orange FY 2011-12 Equipment Detail[7]

Department Number vehicles Cost
OC Watersheds Replacement vehicle (truck) $40,000
Health Care Agency (4) Vehicles $220,000
Building & Safety General Fund Vehicle (SUV) $25,000
OC Public Works Vehicle (SUV) $24,000
OC Dana Point Harbor Off-Road Utility Vehicle $50,000
OC Road (9) Vehicles $524,000
Sheriff’s Narcotics Program Vehicle (SUV) $60,000
OC County Housing Authority (2) Vehicles (sedans) $50,000
OC Housing Vehicle (sedan) $30,000
Airport-Operating Replacement vehicle (truck) $40,000
OC Fleet Services (54) Vehicles $1,965,000
OC Waste & Recycling (9) Vehicles $489,000
OC Flood (11) Vehicles $860,000
OC Parks (16) Vehicles $579,000

The total cost of vehicles for FY 2011-12 is $4,956,000[8]

[edit] Salary disclosure

In 2007, the Orange County Register requested current and former County employee names, titles and salaries paid during the 2007 calendar year.[9] The request was reviewed with County Counsel and it was determined that the information requested is generally public and must be disclosed. The county outlined its response process to the Florida Sunshine Law in a county newsletter.[9]

The county wrote that a majority of the data were released in May 2008.[9]

[edit] Redaction

Employees were allowed to request redaction of their names due to safety risk. The requests for redaction were reviewed on an individual basis by a panel consisting of staff from Human Resources Department, Social Services Agency and County Counsel.[9]

If a request for redaction did not prove threat to safety if the employers name were revealed, employees requesting redaction were asked for additional information. Employees then had another opportunity to state the significant threat to their safety for review.[9]

[edit] Requester's motive

The county newsletter outlining the information request noted that the intentions of the paper in requesting salary information were not yet known, and could be published by the paper in hard copy or online.[9] The newsletter noted that the California Supreme Court sees salary information as public, the implication being that motive does not matter.[9]

[edit] Salary records project

In 2011, Sunshine Review chose 152 local governments as the focus of research on public employee salaries. The editors of Sunshine Review selected eight states with relevant political contexts (listed alphabetically):

1. California
2. Florida
3. Illinois
4. Michigan
5. New Jersey
6. Pennsylvania
7. Texas
8. Wisconsin

Within these states, the editors of Sunshine Review focused on the most populous cities, counties, and school districts, as well as the emergency services entities within these governments. The purpose of this selection was to develop articles on governments affecting the most citizens.

The salary information garnered from these states were a combination of existing online resources and state Freedom of Information Act requests sent out to the governments.

[edit] Importance of public employee pay disclosure

In July 2010, the LA Times uncovered that officials in Bell, California were making remarkably high salaries.[10] The Chief Administrative Officer Robert Rizzo was earning a yearly $787,637. It was later uncovered that Rizzo's total compensation after taking benefits into account topped $1.5 million dollars a year.[11]

For comparison:[10]

  • Manhattan Beach with about 7,000 fewer people than Bell paid its most recent city manager $257,484 a year.
  • Long Beach, with a population close to 500,000, pays its city manager $235,000 annually.
  • Los Angeles County pays its Chief Executive William T Fujioka $338,458.

[edit] Corruption solution

After the Los Angeles Times report, governments began to proactively disclose salary information of its employees. Before the end of the Summer of 2010, more than a dozen cities in Orange County, for example, posted salary information on the front pages of their websites.[12]

The cost of transparency websites maintaining such information ranges from the tens of thousands to the hundreds of thousands. These websites also save money, and this often is not taken into account when measuring costs.

Citizens upset about the breach of trust and armed with information formed a group called the Bell Association to Stop the Abuse, which pushed for an independent audit of city salaries and contracts.[13]

Citizens, empowered with information, are key to keeping government free from corruption and efficient. A study published by the Pew Charitable Trusts and the Economy League of Greater Philadelphia revealed that the city of Philadelphia has a problem with the efficiency and costs of public employee pensions. [14]. The amount that Philadelphia pays to pension recipients limits the city’s ability to use its budget effectively. The report revealed that there were more individuals receiving pension benefits—33,907 claimants in 2006—than workers in the city—28,701. [14] The authors of the study recommend three steps towards addressing the problem of high costs in pensions. [14] First, improve data collection so that decision-making in terms of pension policies is more informed. Second, promote transparency for better accountability to citizens. Third, reduce costs and use the savings for developing Philadelphia.

[edit] Resistance to public employee salary data as public records

The idea of making public employee salaries is relatively new. In 2008, several local government employee associations and unions protested the posting of state employee salaries by the newspaper The Sacramento Bee.[15] [16] At the time, it was seen as a safety risk and invasion of privacy.

[edit] Sunshine Review aims in posting salary information

Often times, publicly posted salaries leave out important information. Salary schedules can be published are ranges, not as specific take-home compensation.[12] [11]And high-level, highly-paid positions are often not disclosed proactively.[12] Additionally, salaries leave out compensation received through health and retirement benefits, as well as benefits such as commuter allowances and cell phone reimbursements. This project aims to close the gap and provide a more accurate picture of public employee salaries for the sake of public education and transparency.

[edit] See also

[edit] External links

[edit] References

blog comments powered by Disqus