Pennsylvania transparency headlines
From Sunshine Review
This article is a list of transparency related news from Pennsylvania.
 | ||||
| Report It • | The Good • | The Bad • | The Ugly | |
Clearfield County, PA - Pennsylvania’s Right to Know law has been interpreted by the Office of Open Records to mean that records held by a company hired by a Commonwealth agency are considered public records and are subject to the law. Therefore, the records need to be supplied by the agency even if they do not have physical possession of the required records.
In this case, the Greater Pennsylvania Regional council of Carpenters requested public information about the payroll disbursements of a Clearfield County grant given to the Bionol ethanol project through the Clearfield County Economic Development Corporation. The Office of Open Records ruled that the records are public and still subject to the Right to Know Law.
Bionol estimates the cost to copy the payroll records, redacting social security numbers, is approximately $6000 for the 6,000 pages, and that it would take longer than the 30-day deadline given by the Office of Open Records. Furthermore, Bionol is asking for the payment up front. The Right to Know law limits the county charge for public records copies to 25cents per page. The law does not actually say who would be responsible for the additional cost, so negotiations are in process.[1]
Monroe County, Pennsylvania Monroe county judge, Ronald Vican, overturned two rulings of the newly founded Office of Open Records (OOR) this month, dealing a blow to Pennsylvania transparency and open records. The cases revolve around a number of school district documents including information packets and W-2 forms.
YORK TOWNSHIP, Pennsylvania: The Board of Commissioners of York Township in York County, Pennsylvania voted on September 8 to appeal a decision of the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records. In a possibly unprecedented move, however, the Board of Commissioners will not foot the bill for the legal appeal; rather, one commissioner will personally pay for the legal fight.[2]
The York Township Commissioners had denied several neighborhood housing projects early in 2009. The emails request was made to the Commissioners by the developer's attorney, but it was denied. The attorney then took the request to the state office of open records, who ruled that the township was required to turn over the emails. The developer responded by filing a lawsuit suggesting that two of the Commissioners were involved in an illegal conspiracy to stop the project.
The Board of Commissioners had twice previously voted not to appeal the directive to the York County Court of Common Pleas and had urged the two commissioners to turn over the personal and business emails. In a closed session, the 3-2 decision to fight the decision of the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records stipulates that no taxpayer funds be used in the legal battle.[2]
The plea agreements that the judges were discussing collapsed, but they would have sent them to jail for 87 months on two counts. Now they are charged with racketeering, fraud, money laundering, extortion, bribery and tax violations for allegedly accepting $2.8 million from the owner and builder of two for-profit juvenile detention centers that made millions from county contracts with the judges’ help, read a U.S. Attorney’s Office press release.
The U.S. Attorney's Office did not make actual indictment public after it was handed down the evening of September 9, 2009 in Harrisburg. A spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Heidi Havens, said the indictment will likely be posted September 10.[3]
The school district's swap deals cost them and taxpayers over $57-million since they began using them in 2003, warranting Auditor General Jack Wagner's impending investigation. A swap is an agreement to pay off debt that is based on a variable short-term interest rate, with the hope that lending rates will stay below long-term interest rates.
The BASD conducted 17 swap transactions through JP Morgan and Morgan Stanley, the most of any school district in Pennsylvania. They were supposed to save taxpayers money, according to Superintendent Joseph Lewis, but the raised rates incurred a penalty.[4]
Wagner's office will look at the economic impact the swaps had on BASD after state Senator Lisa Boscola's June call for a thorough review.[3]
The Pennsylvania House Republican Policy Committee held a hearing yesterday on proposals to create a state spending transparency for Pennsylvania, with particular attention paid to HB 1460 (similar legislation passed the Pennsylvania Senate last month).
Lawmakers heard testimony from the Center for Fiscal Accountability, sponsors of transparency websites in Kansas and Missouri, the Commonwealth Foundation, and the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records. Presenters noted the benefits of transparency portals, the likely effect of reducing open records requests, and the savings experienced in other states, while rejecting claims of exorbitant costs or that the information was already available.
"A state open records request has York Township looking into options for how e-mails are received and sent by its commissioners, because some e-mails may be in a private company's files and are not open to public review.
In a March appeal involving township Commissioner Philip W. Briddell, the state's Office of Open Records said that e-mails in a private company's files are public if they include correspondence by a public official. But the open records office said it can't force a municipality to search those files, and can't force a company to produce the e-mails."
"Just because the Wall Street West effort receives more than $20 million in public funding doesn’t mean its finances are subject to public scrutiny.
That’s according to officials at Wall Street West, the nonprofit economic development group, which successfully argued before the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records that it is not subject to the state Right to Know Law."
"Citizens exercising their "right to know" have met few obstacles throughout the Centre County area, although the same can't be said statewide.
Most of the municipalities in the area have seen limited requests for information and haven't run into problems in addressing the citizens' concerns unlike at the state level, where problems have been reported by The Associated Press."
"The state has ruled that Lancaster County must supply autopsy records in two cases to the Lancaster New Era.
In addition, the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records has admonished the county for not complying with the state's Right to Know law when it rejected the newspaper's request."
[edit] See also
| |||||||
Cite error:
<ref> tags exist, but no <references/> tag was found
