Sunshine Review:Articles nominated for deletion
From Sunshine Review
Sunshine Review's article standards then please list them below.[edit] Reasons for deletion
Reasons for deletion include, but are not limited to, the following (subject to the condition that improvement or deletion of an offending section, if practical, is preferable to deletion of an entire page):
- Copyright violations and other material violating Wikipedia's non-free content criteria
- Vandalism, including inflammatory redirects, pages that exist only to disparage their subject, patent nonsense, or gibberish
- Advertising or other spam without relevant content (but not an article about an advertising-related subject)
- Content forks (unless a merger or redirect is appropriate)
- Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms, original theories and conclusions, and articles that are themselves hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes)
- Articles for which all attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed
- Articles whose subjects fail to meet the relevant notability guideline
- Articles that breach Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons
- Redundant or otherwise useless templates
- No citations are included in the articles
- Categories representing overcategorization
- Images that are unused, obsolete, or violate fair-use policy
- Any other use of the article, template, project, or user namespace that is contrary to the established separate policy for that namespace.
- Any other content not suitable for an encyclopedia
[edit] List articles below you think should be deleted
Portions of this article were taken from Wikipedia on 4/21/09.
