Sunshine Review:Collaboration

From Sunshine Review

Sunshine Review Projects
General information Main project page talk  → Article requests talk  → Cheat sheet talk  → Help talk Portals on SR talk Project banner talk Project category talk Departments Collaboration talk U.S. States talk Outreach talk Peer review talk edit changes

	The current Sunshine Review collaboration is Missouri Last months winner was NA Please feel free to cast your vote

Sunshine Review collaboration is a coordinated effort by Sunshine Review to improve its content. However, adopting a project is not a prerequisite for participation in this collaboration (nor, of course, is participation a requirement for membership in the project). All contributors, regardless of their level of expertise on the subject, are welcome to contribute.

Aside from the main benefit of creating better articles on Sunshine Review, it is hoped that the successful execution of this initiative will a) Attract new editors to work on the Project; b) Improve the writing skills of existing editors; and c) Demonstrate the value of collaboration on Sunshine Review.

Projects can be defined by a topic like the Department of Education, TIF districts to geographical like New Hampshire. There is an endless amount of information that will need to be developed on Sunshine Review.

Articles that are complex or have potential to address broad subjects on the wiki should be nominated for collaborative efforts.

• If you are an institution looking to make an organized contribution over a lengthy period of time please see Institutional Cooperation

[edit] Comparison of each state's county websites

Nominated January 21 2009

Support:

1. Maverick 09:12, 21 January 2009 (CST)

Comments:

I'm nominating this article because the information could be really useful if it were up to date with all the currently rated county websites. Maverick 09:12, 21 January 2009 (CST)

[edit] Nomination procedure

Any user may nominate an article to be collaborated upon. Nominees should:

• Need a significant amount of work in terms of content, organization, prose, etc.
• Not be in any edit conflict or be under protection.

If you would like to nominate an article, please add it at the bottom of the list of nominees along with a short note describing why you think it should be chosen.

For Nominators:
Please use the following code when nominating an article.

===[[ARTICLE NAME]]===
''Nominated [[MONTH DAY]], [[YEAR]];''

Support:

1. (sign with four tildes)

Comments:

• (put your reason for nomination, sign again)

----

For Voters:
Please use the following code when voting to support an article.

#~~~

[edit] Nominations...

A list of past collaborations can be viewed here.

Please list nominees below using the code laid out in the above section. Newer nominees should be placed on the bottom of the list. Feel free to vote for as many nominees as you wish, but only once per nomination. Please only vote to indicate support, do not vote in the negative. If you like, add a comment in the comment's section under nomination, or on the collaboration talk page. Articles will remain on the list for 3 months, after which time the list will be blanked/refreshed and voting started anew. For the current collaboration, see the template at the top of the page.

Nominations will occur on the 1st of the month

This article was taken and modified from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia under the GNU license.